<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Light Bulb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seancwing.com/2009/10/07/the-light-bulb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seancwing.com/2009/10/07/the-light-bulb/</link>
	<description>Lost Boy + Creative Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel H.</title>
		<link>http://seancwing.com/2009/10/07/the-light-bulb/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanwing326.com/blog/?p=252#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Why would the company that makes this light bulb bother to develop another more efficient light bulb if no one buys this one though? :P

Also, why would it be wise for people in &quot;third world&quot; countries to buy this light bulb? If your analysis holds true, the cost/benefit ratio will be more favorable later and the price would be roughly equal too. A new PC top of the line PC is about the same price or less than a top of the line PC 5 or 10 years ago. Why shouldn&#039;t they just wait like everyone else?

Furthermore, should we assume that light bulb tech will continue to increase in efficiency at a steady rate. There would be hardly any concrete advantages to a light bulb that lasts 100 yrs as opposed to one that lasts 200 yrs. (Someone would probably accidentally break it before than anyways :P) So why would a company waste time/money in development?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the company that makes this light bulb bother to develop another more efficient light bulb if no one buys this one though? <img src='http://seancwing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, why would it be wise for people in &#8220;third world&#8221; countries to buy this light bulb? If your analysis holds true, the cost/benefit ratio will be more favorable later and the price would be roughly equal too. A new PC top of the line PC is about the same price or less than a top of the line PC 5 or 10 years ago. Why shouldn&#8217;t they just wait like everyone else?</p>
<p>Furthermore, should we assume that light bulb tech will continue to increase in efficiency at a steady rate. There would be hardly any concrete advantages to a light bulb that lasts 100 yrs as opposed to one that lasts 200 yrs. (Someone would probably accidentally break it before than anyways <img src='http://seancwing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ) So why would a company waste time/money in development?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
